Camtasia Video
Tuesday, April 24, 2012 | 4:48 AM | 0 comments
Yeah,mister i hope u like it :D
BSD and Z/OS
Friday, April 13, 2012 | 7:49 AM | 0 comments
Berkeley Software Distribution (BSD, sometimes called Berkeley Unix) is a Unix operating system derivative developed and distributed by the Computer Systems Research Group (CSRG) of the University of California, Berkeley, from 1977 to 1995. Today the term "BSD" is often used non-specifically to refer to any of the BSD descendants which together form a branch of the family of Unix-like operating systems. Operating systems derived from the original BSD code remain actively developed and widely used.
Historically, BSD has been considered a branch of UNIX—"BSD UNIX", because it shared the initial codebase and design with the original AT&T UNIX operating system. In the 1980s, BSD was widely adopted by vendors of workstation-class systems in the form of proprietary UNIX variants such as DEC ULTRIX and Sun Microsystems SunOS. This can be attributed to the ease with which it could be licensed, and the familiarity it found among the founders of many technology companies of this era.
Though these proprietary BSD derivatives were largely superseded by the UNIX System V Release 4 and OSF/1 systems in the 1990s (both of which incorporated BSD code and are the basis of other modern Unix systems), later BSD releases provided a basis for several open source development projects, e.g. FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD or DragonFly, that are ongoing. These, in turn, have been incorporated in whole or in part in modern proprietary operating systems, e.g the TCP/IP (IPv4 only) networking code in Microsoft Windows or the foundation of Apple's Mac OS X.
What Is Z/OS?
z/OS is the computer operating system for IBM's zSeries 900 (z900) line of large (mainframe) servers. z/OS is a renamed and upgraded version of OS/390, which in turn evolved from the MVS operating system. IBM's renamed servers and operating systems reflect a strategy to realign its products more closely with the Internet and its own e-business initiatives.
z/OS is described as an extremely scalable and secure high-performance operating system based on the 64-bit z/Architecture. Like its predecessor, OS/390, z/OS lays claim to being highly reliable for running mission-critical applications. The operating system supports Web- and Java-based applications.
RELATED GLOSSARY TERMS: data center evaporative cooling (swamp cooling), HP OpenView, event forwarding, VM (virtual machine), smoke testing, COBOL (Common Business Oriented Language), Bloom Energy Server, fuel cell, BAL (Basic Assembler Language or branch-and-link), cook-off test
Windows Phone
| 7:29 AM | 0 comments
What is Windows Phone?Let's see...
Windows Phone is a mobile operating system developed by Microsoft, and is the successor to its Windows Mobile platform, although incompatible with it.Unlike its predecessor, it is primarily aimed at the consumer market rather than the enterprise market. It was launched in Europe, Singapore, Australia, New Zealand, the US, Canada, Mexico, and the EPAL region in the second half of 2010, and Asia in early 2011.With Windows Phone, Microsoft offers a new user interface with its design language, Metro, integrates the operating system with third party and other Microsoft services, and set minimum requirements to the hardware on which it runs.
Operating System
| 7:23 AM | 0 comments
What is Operating System or OS?Let's see....trolololool
An operating system (OS) is a set of programs that manage computer hardware resources and provide common services for application software. The operating system is a vital component of the system software in a computer system. Application programs require an operating system which are usually separate programs, but can be combined in simple systems.
Time-sharing operating systems schedule tasks for efficient use of the system and may also include accounting for cost allocation of processor time, mass storage, printing, and other resources.
For hardware functions such as input and output and memory allocation, the operating system acts as an intermediary between application programs and the computer hardware, although the application code is usually executed directly by the hardware and will frequently make a system call to an OS function or be interrupted by it. Operating systems are found on almost any device that contains a computer—from cellular phones and video game consoles to supercomputers and web servers.
Examples of popular modern operating systems include Android, BSD, iOS, Linux, Mac OS X, Microsoft Windows, Windows Phone, and Z/OS. All these, except Windows and Z/OS, share roots in Unix.
Ericsson R380
| 7:15 AM | 0 comments
What is Ericsson R380?
The Ericsson R380 Smartphone was a GSM mobile phone made by Ericsson, released in 2000. It combined the functions of a mobile phone and a personal digital assistant (PDA). It was the first device marketed as a 'smartphone'. In December 1999 the magazine Popular Science appointed the Ericsson R380 Smartphone to one of the most important advances in science and technology. It was a groundbreaking device since it was as small and light as a normal mobile phone.It was the first device to use the new Symbian OS.[
The display was a black and white touchscreen, partially covered by a flip. For that reason it can be considered the clear forerunner of the popular P800/P900 series of smartphones. It predates the UIQ user interface which runs on those later phones, but again, the heritage is clear.
Despite the sophisticated user interface, users could not install their own software on the device.
The phone and the software was developed at Ericsson's lab in Kista, Sweden. The UI was developed at Ericsson's Software Applications Laboratory in Warrington, UK. The UI was built using an in-house developed library called the Ericsson Control Kit (ECK).
The device was delivered in three variants. The most common being the R380s (Dual 900/1800 GSM bands) and the (rarer) R380 World (Dual 900/1900 GSM Bands). The final variant with minor software and cosmetic upgrades was designated the R380e.
Ipod
| 7:09 AM | 0 comments
Whaat is the iPod?Let's see...
iPod is a line of portable media players created and marketed by Apple Inc.. The product line-up consists of the hard drive-based iPod classic, the touchscreen iPod touch, the compact iPod nano and the ultra-compact iPod shuffle. iPod classic models store media on an internal hard drive, while all other models use flash memory to enable their smaller size (the discontinued mini used a Microdrive miniature hard drive). As with many other digital music players, iPods can serve as external data storage devices. Storage capacity varies by model, ranging from 2 GB for the iPod shuffle to 160 GB for the iPod classic. The iPod line was announced by Apple on October 23, 2001, and released on November 10, 2001.
All of the models have been redesigned multiple times since their introduction. The most recent iPod redesigns were introduced on September 1, 2010. Apple's iTunes software can be used to transfer music to the devices from computers using certain versions of Apple Macintosh and Microsoft Windows operating systems.[2] For users who choose not to use iTunes or whose computers cannot run iTunes, several open source alternatives are available for the iPod.[3] iTunes and its alternatives may also transfer photos, videos, games, contact information, e-mail settings, Web bookmarks, and calendars to iPod models supporting those features. Discontinued models of the line include the iPod mini and the iPod photo, the former being replaced by the iPod nano, and the latter reintegrated into the main iPod line (now the iPod classic).
In iOS versions prior to iOS 5, the iPod branding is also used for the media player applications included with the iPhone and iPad; the iPhone version is essentially a combination of the Music and Videos apps on the iPod touch. As of iOS 5, separate apps named 'Music' and 'Video' are standardized across all iOS-powered productsWhile the iPhone and iPad have essentially the same media-player capabilities as the iPod line, they are generally treated as separate products. In the last few years, iPhone and iPad sales have overtaken those of the iPod.
Mobile Operating System
| 7:04 AM | 0 comments
What is Mobile Operating System?A mobile operating system (mobile OS) is the operating system that controls a smartphone, tablet, PDA, or other mobile device. Modern mobile operating systems combine the features of a personal computer operating system with touchscreen, cellular, Bluetooth, WiFi, GPS mobile navigation, camera, video camera, speech recognition, voice recorder, music player, Near field communication, personal digital assistant (PDA), and other features.
Mobile operating system milestones mirror the development of mobile phones and smartphones:
1979-1992 Mobile phones have embedded systems to control operation.
1993 The first smartphone, the IBM Simon, had a touchscreen, email, and PDA features.
1996 Palm Pilot 1000 personal digital assistant is introduced with the Palm OS mobile operating system.
1996 First Windows CE Handheld PC devices are introduced.
2000 Symbian became the first modern mobile OS on a smartphone with the launch of the Ericsson R380.
2001 The Kyocera 6035 is the first smartphone with Palm OS.
2002 Microsoft's first Windows CE (Pocket PC) smartphones are introduced.
2002 BlackBerry releases its first smartphone.
2007 Apple iPhone with iOS introduced as an iPod, "mobile phone" and "internet communicator."[1]
2007 Open Handset Alliance (OHA) formed formed by Google, HTC, Sony, Dell, Intel, Motorola, Samsung, LG, etc.[2]
2008 OHA releases Android 1.0 with the HTC Dream (T-Mobile G1) as the first Android phone.
2009 Palm introduced webOS with the Palm Pre. By 2012 webOS devices were no longer sold.
2009 Samsung announces the Bada OS with the introduction of the Samsung S8500.
2010 Windows Phone OS phones are released but are not compatible with the previous Windows Mobile OS.
2011 The MeeGo the first mobile Linux, combined Maemo and Moblin, was introduced with Nokia N9 in effect of cooperation of Nokia, Intel and Linux Foundation
2012 The Lenovo K800 will be the first Intel powered smartphone (Android OS).
Mobile operating system milestones mirror the development of mobile phones and smartphones:
1979-1992 Mobile phones have embedded systems to control operation.
1993 The first smartphone, the IBM Simon, had a touchscreen, email, and PDA features.
1996 Palm Pilot 1000 personal digital assistant is introduced with the Palm OS mobile operating system.
1996 First Windows CE Handheld PC devices are introduced.
2000 Symbian became the first modern mobile OS on a smartphone with the launch of the Ericsson R380.
2001 The Kyocera 6035 is the first smartphone with Palm OS.
2002 Microsoft's first Windows CE (Pocket PC) smartphones are introduced.
2002 BlackBerry releases its first smartphone.
2007 Apple iPhone with iOS introduced as an iPod, "mobile phone" and "internet communicator."[1]
2007 Open Handset Alliance (OHA) formed formed by Google, HTC, Sony, Dell, Intel, Motorola, Samsung, LG, etc.[2]
2008 OHA releases Android 1.0 with the HTC Dream (T-Mobile G1) as the first Android phone.
2009 Palm introduced webOS with the Palm Pre. By 2012 webOS devices were no longer sold.
2009 Samsung announces the Bada OS with the introduction of the Samsung S8500.
2010 Windows Phone OS phones are released but are not compatible with the previous Windows Mobile OS.
2011 The MeeGo the first mobile Linux, combined Maemo and Moblin, was introduced with Nokia N9 in effect of cooperation of Nokia, Intel and Linux Foundation
2012 The Lenovo K800 will be the first Intel powered smartphone (Android OS).
Blackberry Bold vs Iphone 3G
| 6:37 AM | 0 comments
Appearance
Blackberry Bold comes with physical Sharp and Clean. Black at the front, chrome besides. The layout looks simple. iPhone 3G can not be denied his performance is very interesting and possibly gadget fads today.
Blackberry Bold has a fairly wide body and may be less convenient to operate with one hand. Other case with the iPhone 3G look more sleek and very comfortable to use with one hand. Unfortunately the iPhone 3G does not have the original keyboard (aka virtual keyboard only) and this could be a problem especially for those who do not like the virtual keyboard. While the Blackberry Bold, the keyboard is very comfortable to use writing (either email or sms) to the layout and attractive appearance.
For the screen, the BlackBerry Bold has a stunning screen, pictures, photos, video looks so natural on the Blackberry Bold. iPhone 3G has a 3.5 inch large screen, and also very good in displaying a variety of content, of course, provided you do not activate the virtual keyboard.
Performance
Battery for Blackberry Bold affairs can certainly be better than the iPhone 3G. Even the Blackberry Bold is the battery life has arguably the best of all previous Blackberry series. As for business check email or relating to the activities office, the Blackberry Bold is still superior to the iPhone 3G. When you write an SMS or Email, then the Blackberry Bold you can do it faster than the iPhone.
In terms of data security, by default the Blackberry Bold has the encryption feature for data-critical data (ranging from email, sms and even phonebook) so that data security is guaranteed and not just anyone can access the data on the Blackberry Bold is not surprising that many people are saying that the Blackberry is the most secure devices in the world (especially for business). While the iPhone, it seems in terms of safety still need to be an improvement.
Price
Here it is often a consideration when buying a phone person. Can not be denied the iPhone has a higher price than the Blackberry Bold. Besides when I want to buy an iPhone we do not have much choice (only available in Telkomsel) while for the Blackberry Bold we can compare between the operator of one another.
How about application?
IPhone apps more clear than on that of the Bold, especially from the inventory application on its App Store Apple with Blackberry.In Blackberry,we can install with Blackberry App World with more than 100 aplication ...
How about gaming?
Okay, the Bold is a business phone, so the game is not so considered, in contrast with the iPhone is aimed at mobile entertainment let alone supported by its motion sensor, so the iPhone wins hands down here.
How about network?
I compare the network here is not a GSM network but on the network used for data, the Bold has advantages with BIS (push email, chat, surf without limit) but the iPhone was actually able to do this, the circuitry internet subscriptions unlimited as flash at a cheaper cost (Axis BB service does not count) can be used for everything including streaming. and sharing with a computer.
My opinion is Blackberry Bold moooorreee better than iPhone 3G and what about you?
Source:Click Me!! and another blog
Symbian vs Android
| 5:44 AM | 0 comments
Symbian OS is an OS that has long existed, so you could say he was already old. Since Symbian released a new version in 2005 that is version 9, Symbian has undergone many updates, one update of the newest Symbian Belle.
In addition to Symbian, maybe you already know this one OS, the Android. Android is a relatively new player in the arena of the current OS, Android OS was acquired by Google in 2005 and we see the Android OS from 2008. Android is really popular among smartphone users, so do not be surprised if the OS is an OS is becoming the most sought after by many people.
Why OS is so important?Why?Why?Why?trololol...
Why do so many people are talking about the OS? OS on phones like Symbian, Android, and Windows Mobile software made by companies to accelerate time to reduce the manufacturing and development costs. Silicon chip makers cut tailor them according to the OS, as seen from the features and capabilities. This makes the development of OS-based phones easier.
Here Paseban will compare two of the most recognized OS out there that is Android and Symbian.
Firmware
Say you have a Symbian S60v3 phone. Then you want a phone with Symbian s60v5, then you must give up your old phone s60v3 is 'dumped' to get the new s60v5 phones by spending more money.
But if you air-mobile Android OS, you only have to update its OS only. For example, if you have a phone that runs on v1.6 and want to get version 2.1, then you only need to upgrade the phone software using your computer. Only by doing so your Android OS will be replaced and you will have a display phone with new features and new user interface as well. So you do not need to spend more money to buy a new phone.
Flashing your phone with new firmware
If you are using a Symbian phone and you do not like the style of the phone menu, you only have two options to change his appearance, namely:
Install a new theme for your phone.
Flash your phone with new firmware or ROM via a computer.
If you have been using cell phones over a long time, you will know that the steps to renew your Symbian mobile phone as above is risky, even your cell phone will be totally dead. But a different case if you use the Android OS, you have three options for reform:
Install a new theme
Install the new launcher menu
Flash phones with new custom firmware
Or rom firmware must be downloaded from the internet. Paseban recommend you to use flash, because flash function to recover the phone menu. So, if there is something wrong in your recovery process for this, your phone can be restored to its original condition through the recovery menu.
Change the phone features
For those of you who have a Symbian phone and want to change the look of the menu, you can get a lot of new applications available on the outcome there. However, this method will take your precious phone memory. The only other alternative is to get a costume firmware and then do the flash, but again this is very risky.
Unlike the Android phone, the OS is there some tweaks that can be done. You can remove the default file browser and then download and install the new file browser. It is not at risk and no additional memory will be occupied by the application useless.
Processor and speed
The processor is very important, but this chip also determine whether your phone can accept it or not. Symbian phones can not let you keep an eye on the processor that is running on your phone, but there are some applications for Android that can help you save battery life by controlling the speed of the processor. If you are on a low battery condition then you can slow down the processor speed to stay alive for a long time.
Conclusion
Symbian phones do not let you do some modifications on their phones, but it is inversely proportional to Android, you can do whatever you want. And the fact that the Android OS is far more advanced that ultimately deliver more value to users, but still requires the Symbian OS to the latest update features.
Source: Click Me!!
Windows 8 vs Mac OS X Lion
| 4:19 AM | 0 comments
Forgot to post this <3.And no i would like to tell you about Windows 8 vs Mac OS X Lion.
On the other side we have Apple, which unveiled its latest desktop operating system, Mac OS X Lion, fully gestated, without a chance for the public to run it beforehand. Both operating systems exhibit a similar trend: emulating the company's mobile operating system in their desktop OS. For Lion, Apple drew heavily on iOS in several ways—its App Store, Launchpad screen of icons, and touch interface among the most notable. Windows 8 will be no exception to this mobile-to-desktop trend, as evidenced by the Windows 8 Developer Preview, released last September in Anaheim.
Both companies have been very open about this mobile-envy: in October of 2010 at an event on the Apple Cupertino campus called "Back to the Mac," the world got its first peek at the stylish tech firm's latest desktop operating system, "OS X Lion." CEO Steve Jobs explained that the success of the company's iPad tablet was a major driver in adding features to Lion.
The similarities don't end at the two future desktop OS's mobile influencers. Both Lion and Window 8 will make heavy use of touch interfaces, but with a big difference, as you'll see in the slideshow below. Both will have an App Store, both have full-screen app views, and both offer new ways to switch among and navigate within apps.
There are, of course, important differences between Microsoft and Apple's overall OS strategies It all hinges on tablet support. Apple is aligning its tablet and phone OSes, and keeping the desktop OS separate, though mobile-influenced. Microsoft, on the other hand, is creating one OS for tablets and desktops, while keeping the phone OS separate—for now, anyway. Both companies may even have ideas for a grand unified OS for all devices.
Clearly, the tablet and mobile worlds have begun to impact the desktop OS in a major way. This begs the question: Can the desktop survive? Once you see all the powerful goodies these new system software heavyweights bring to the table, however, you'd be hard pressed to make a case for the irrelevance of the desktop computer.
source:Click Me!!
Windows 8 vs Mac OS
| 4:19 AM | 0 comments
Okay begin the story.
battles and their OEM relationships have weakened. On the other hand, Apple’s biggest weapon, Steve Jobs, is also out of this fight. That could get it interesting.
Apple set the bar with the original MacOS and Microsoft passed them with a less integrated and, at the time, less regarded product Windows (which initially was just an overlay on DOS). This was largely because Microsoft was able to call on IBM, Compaq, HP and other large players to enable their PC to enter the business segment and overwhelm Apple in that market. However, through most of that time, it was actually Commodore that dominated the market due to its tight focus on the consumer.
Windows 95
In 1994, Windows 95, which was driven by a still energized Bill Gates, Brad Silverberg, and Brad Chase trounced Apple and got iPod like lines at launch. Commodore, having tried and failed to go after the business market, was gone. Apple, in response, tried to go after businesses more aggressively and even licensed their OS. The result was that Apple found itself on a path to non-existence. It is interesting to note that Microsoft’s launch budget (estimated to have been $200 million in 1995 or nearly $300 million in today’s dollars) turned out to be half of what was actually needed, because it ran out after launch and sales volume, which started out with long Apple like lines, nearly slammed to a halt. It should also be noted that it was consumers that drove this wave, not businesses, who tried to stop Windows 95 and were overwhelmed by users bringing it in anyway.
Steve Jobs Apple
With Steve Jobs back at Apple, Apple stopped going after businesses and stopped the cloning to focus exclusively on their hardware and the consumer. Windows held its status until Microsoft shipped Windows Vista, but Microsoft took back lost space when Windows 7 corrected the problems Vista had created. However, the business market largely locked down on Windows XP, a product Microsoft had shipped years earlier. New consumer products from Apple, first the iPod, then the iPhone, and finally the iPad flanked Windows and overwhelmed Microsoft to dominate their respective markets. Only Android, a free iOS clone offering from Google seemed to effectively challenge Apple and mostly only with carriers and geographies that couldn’t get much of Apple’s offering.
Super User
The formula that repeatedly seems to win with user products is to focus almost exclusively on the consumer and the budget that assured Windows 95’s success should have been $600 million in today’s dollars against a weakened Apple and an IBM (OS/2) that was all but out of the market. Apple’s success was tightly tied to Steve Jobs and his use as a “super user” – a unique concept in the market.
I figure I’d better define this. A “super user” is one that defines the product and, by proxy represents, all users. What made Steve Jobs unique is that he was also the CEO of Apple and in a position to fund his conclusion to success. For instance, if you look at the iPhone, the RIM keyboard form factor should have likely been preferred based on usage, but Jobs funded demand generation efforts to a level that RIM could not match and changed the perception, which forced an Apple favorable outcome.
In effect, he had the resources to change how people looked at the market. Tim Cook, Apple’s new CEO, has the authority, but he appears to be a more traditional CEO and may not fill this unique super user slot (outside of founders, this method is rarely used and most caretaker CEOs don’t get that involved in product creation or marketing).
Defining the Battle to Come
By the way, it appears when both firms do best, it is when the products have adequate marketing funding and are focused on the consumer who then drives the product into businesses. Having corporate features can speed this business penetration, but they don’t make up for a lack of consumer demand (thus why XP was so hard to displace and why Apple has penetrated businesses massively without those features).
Windows 8 is still a year off, giving Apple a year to respond and Microsoft has not been able to sustain a highly funded marketing campaign for long (it appears they have largely pulled the plug on their Windows Phone 7 efforts for instance). Their marketing budget for Windows, based on Windows 95 numbers and a vastly stronger Apple (who will be fighting back) and a wider geographic coverage than was the case in 1995, should likely approach $1 billion to assure success, but it is estimated to be well short of half of that.
On the other hand, Steve Jobs isn’t running Apple and that will likely slow and weaken Apple’s response. They didn’t take the Windows 95 risk that seriously without Steve Jobs either. It is interesting to note we never really saw a Steve Jobs vs. Bill Gates matchup as Bill actually helped Apple recover (giving Steve Jobs $100 million when he first came back to Apple) and then exiting much of Microsoft before the iPod shipped. This placed Jobs against Ballmer and Jobs won.
Now it is Tim Cook, who is new to the CEO roll against Ballmer, who is not. Both men likely realize how important this is to their success, but Ballmer has more experience in the roll than Cook does, on the other hand, he tends to underfund marketing and focus on businesses while Cook may not make that mistake.
Who Wins?
Likely it will come down to who wants the win more and is willing to stretch to make it happen. Steve Ballmer is largely thought to be a failure as a CEO, but if he hits this out of the park that perception will change quickly. Tim Cook is untested and if he fails here, he will likely follow Yahoo’s Carol Bartz into obscurity. It is important to Ballmer that he is not seen as someone who just got the job because he is Bill Gates’ less than competent friend, and Cook certainly doesn’t want to end his CEO life as a failure.
A lot of us don’t believe that anyone can run Microsoft or Apple successfully, the first has become too complex and the second requires Steve Jobs. Both CEOs have a unique opportunity to assure their respective legacies along with their companies. Cook will need to stretch to become Jobs and Ballmer will need to do whatever it takes to assure Windows 8 and consumer demand. It is unlikely that either will survive failure. Either firm can win, but it will come down to who wants success the most.
Windows XP vs Windows 7
| 2:55 AM | 0 comments
Okay i will talk about Windows XP vs Windows 7.What is your hero?Windows XP or Windows 7?but shut up and don't say anything'cause i will to explain this.This my homework from my teacher Mr.Ato.Okay i will start now...First i will talk about windows xp.
- Windows XP Professional
- Windows XP Home Edition
- Windows XP Media Center Edition
- Windows XP Tablet PC Edition
- Windows XP Starter Edition
- Windows XP Professional x64 Edition
- Windows XP Professional 64-Bit Edition for Itanium
- Windows XP Professional
Windows xp has a better efficiency than Windows 98, Windows ME, and Windows 2000 Professional * Applause to Windows xp*.And that is not less interesting Windows XP already comes with the features of the access control settings.
And now i will to explain about windows 7.Windows 7 is the next version of Microsoft Windows that will replace Windows Vista.You know windows vista right?okay i will continue the information.But certainly windows 7 faster than windows vista.Windows 7 Home Basic, Windows 7 Home Premium, Windows 7 Professional, Windows 7 Ultimate, Windows 7 Enterprise are version from windows 7.
And this is the comparison
For speed windows xp often no response,jajaja....But windows 7 in my laptop , no response is not often the case like windows xp on my computer xp but more application did you have and ram is used also affects how the PC work
For Scene,windows xp don't have many theme colorfull like windows 7.Amazing...
For MultiTasking,Windows XP sometimes still experiencing errors or Hang, if user open many applications, the six programs simultaneously,trololol...But but this only happens occasionally on windows 7.
of these results are superior to windows 7 but there are still many programs that do not support Windows 7 and windows spent a lot of ram so it slows down the pc work ...But my opinion is windows xp is better than windows 7 'cause application on windows xp not compatible when i installed windows 7 -_-^^.So what yaour opinion?same with me?or different?Jusst opinion guys.....
Oh my god!Before I do my homework, I read an article from many blogs, I know all this from Click..Me!! and Click Me too!!
Labels: Windows 7 Windos xp